My Fight For Justice
Having asked SCCRC to refer my case to Appeal Court and them point blank “Refusing” to fully investigate my Grounds, I now intend raising the following issues at a Judicial Review.
1. My defence team did not interview 16 defence witnesses before my Trial
2. My defence team never called crucial Forensic evidence.
3. My defence team never called crucial Identification evidence (A Crown witness saying the driver was Forty Years old with brown hair and Moustache)
4. My defence team failed to challenge “unreliable” and “Contradictory” Identification evidence From Witness “Ashford”
5. Crown “Failed” to disclose key evidence at time of trial.
6. Police showed “Photos” before my ID Parade, When they Ought not to have done.
7. The two “Arresting” Officers were involved in the running of my ID Parade, With one “Assisting” with Witnesses, When they ought not to have been involved “At-All”
8. SCCRC “Assured” me they had sent the lawyer that conducted my ID Parade a copy of his own ID Parade report, When “Clearly” they “hadn’t” Evidence of this is available on you-tube under SCCRC Liars.
9. SCCRC refused to interview my witnesses “saying” Their evidence was “Hearsay”
10. Witnesses said in court they were shown Photos of me, Thus allowing the Jury to know i had previous police involvement. This should never happen.
11. The judge “Misdirected” my jury on a few occasions:
A, He told the Jury they need not be absolutely sure of Guilt they only had to be reasonably Certain. B, He told them only to consider eveidence of myself and Louise Morris as she was the only person to see me between 1-6pm, This was not true witnesses spoke of seeing me in Glasgow at 5.15pm. C, He told Jury to consider “Muckles” Evidence with great care because he was an Off-Duty Policeman. D, He inferred that witnesses might have mistaken anorak hoods as Balaclava Helmets, Thus voicing his “own Opinion”. E, He directed that: Ashfords Evidence was “Unreliable” Yet did not direct Jury to Disregard it. SCCRC did not find any fault with any of these complaints even thought in the Gilmour case (Same Judge) The Court “conceded” the very same Misdirection was a Misdirection thus “Undermining” SCCRCs Findings in my case
